“The most alarming rhetoric comes out of the dispute between the liberals and conservatives, and it’s a dangerous waste of time because they’re both right. The perennial conservative concern about high taxes supporting a nonworking “underclass” has entirely legitimate roots in our evolutionary past and shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand. Early hominids lived a precarious existence where freeloaders were a direct threat to survival, and so they developed an exceedingly acute sense of whether they were being taken advantage of by members of their own group. But by the same token, one of the hallmarks of early human society was the emergence of a culture of compassion that cared for the ill, the elderly, the wounded, and the unlucky. In today’s terms, that is a common liberal concern that also has to be taken into account. Those two driving forces have coexisted for hundreds of thousands of years in human society and have been duly codified in this country as a two-party political system. The eternal argument over so-called entitlement programs-and, more broadly, over liberal and conservative thought-will never be resolved because each side represents an ancient and absolutely essential component for our evolutionary past.” -Tribe, by Sebastian Junger.
Does author Sebastian Junger make a valid argument? What does Love ultimately ask of us? What is the greatest common good? If this argument is true, how is it that countries in Europe have managed to create a fundamentally socialist system that cares for its people from cradle to grave? I also wonder if Calvinism with its false “God rewards the righteous with prosperity” theology is at play in this country as well.